In the face of ferocious political polarization, many Americans are frustrated with debate. They wonder what is the point of two people with different points of view trying to find common ground when it feels more like a contest than a conversation.
Historically, major political debates have shaped American politics by changing public discourse and voter engagement. They have also had a significant impact on the campaign strategies of candidates, ultimately shaping electoral outcomes. Debates have provided voters with an opportunity to see and hear candidates in person, to compare their policies and personalities, and to develop a better understanding of the issues at stake.
The format of a debate can have a significant impact on how effectively candidates communicate their messages to the audience. For example, a rapid-fire question format may highlight a candidate’s quick thinking skills while a town hall format allows candidates to build personal connections with voters.
The CPD’s goal is to ensure that voters have a full opportunity to learn about the issues and the candidates for office. CPD’s nonpartisan selection criteria for participating candidates seek to promote fairness, diversity, and integrity in the debate process by focusing on those elements most relevant to a campaign’s national competitiveness and newsworthiness. It is important for candidates to avoid irrelevant attacks on their opponents’ policies and record; be respectful of the moderator, fellow candidates, and voters; answer the question asked and stay within the allotted time limits; and make promises that are consistent, enforceable, and within the jurisdiction of the office being sought.
About the Author
